tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post164579473952667989..comments2023-10-18T00:59:40.216-07:00Comments on Christian Skepticism - a reasonable faith...: Skeptical of Gay DNAoddXianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15427095709766850092noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post-48784960083451128242007-10-16T18:18:00.000-07:002007-10-16T18:18:00.000-07:00Oh, yeah, you guys... And I suppose you also deny ...Oh, yeah, you guys... And I suppose you also deny the scientifically proven Twinkie and PMS Defenses, too!Steve Burrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11532569085171327991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post-7331522573303811302007-10-16T11:42:00.000-07:002007-10-16T11:42:00.000-07:00"But let's suppose that they do find some genetic ...<I>"But let's suppose that they do find some genetic correlation, how they account for the survival of that genetic trait?"</I><BR/><BR/>Right on John. And this is especially true of a homosexual genetic trait.Puritan Ladhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02240560332777968090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post-38582396435456118112007-10-16T10:38:00.000-07:002007-10-16T10:38:00.000-07:00But hang on...I have not seen any studies that con...But hang on...I have not seen any studies that conclusively prove any links between behavior and one's genetic make-up. Even Dawkins admits as much and had to come with the meme concept to account for inherited behavioral traits.<BR/><BR/>But let's suppose that they do find some genetic correlation, how they account for the survival of that genetic trait? It allows the species no selective advantages, and according to evolutionary theory, should have been removed from the gene pool by natural selection a long time ago.John Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11266432452653338841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post-29502939166371158342007-10-16T07:24:00.000-07:002007-10-16T07:24:00.000-07:00Of course, you won't find any research for the fol...Of course, you won't find any research for the following "vices":<BR/><BR/>the "homophobic" gene.<BR/>the "religious" gene.<BR/>the "intolerant" gene.<BR/>the "pro-life" gene.<BR/><BR/>They simply want to be the ones who define morality, and will use phony science to drive this agenda.Puritan Ladhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02240560332777968090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38434833.post-85535315834807291902007-10-16T07:12:00.000-07:002007-10-16T07:12:00.000-07:00Great post!Think about it...Murderers: My DNA mad...Great post!<BR/><BR/>Think about it...<BR/>Murderers: My DNA made me do it.<BR/>Thieves: My DNA made me do it.<BR/>Adulterers: My DNA made me do it.<BR/>Liars: My DNA made me do it.<BR/>etc.<BR/><BR/>Don't be surprised though if their conclusions "find SOMETHING", because if one's agenda drives their science, then their science will be made to fit their agenda.All Things Reformedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07921579806367678328noreply@blogger.com